Non-Competes
Many
businesses, especially those focusing on information or
e-commerce, want to ensure that the training they provide
employees will not someday be used against them by a competitor
when an employee is terminated or resigns.
Also, purchasers of businesses want to ensure that the
seller will not compete against the very business he/she has
just sold. Generally,
the only way to ensure this is by way of a contract commonly
known as a Non-Compete Agreement (“NCA”).
NCAs
are really nothing more than another name for restraints on
trade. By statute,
restraints on trade are generally unlawful in Florida.
However, what one statute giveth another taketh away.
NCAs are specifically permitted in Florida by statute but are
subject to very strict requirements.
Among
these is the requirement of a written instrument. An NCA must be in writing and signed by the party against
whom it is to be enforced.
This may seem basic but there are many instances of
business seeking to enforce verbal NCAs.
As the old saying goes: No tickee, no laundry.
The
statute also covers the length of time that an NCA can be
enforced. Depending on the circumstance, the statute considers
time frames from six months to five years to be presumptively
reasonable. Moreover,
much longer time frames may also be considered reasonable under
certain circumstances.
Another
requirement for effectiveness is that an NCA safeguard a
“legitimate business interest”.
Quite simply, courts will not enforce arbitrary NCAs.
However, it is important to recall that courts judge what
has already occurred; they are classic Monday morning
quarterbacks. What
a court will consider a “legitimate business interest” is
certainly open to interpretation and cannot be precisely known
in advance. Anticipating
judicial interpretation, a properly worded NCA will state the
“legitimate business interest” with specificity and will
obtain from the signatory an admission of this interest.
Direct
competition is a classic interest protected by NCAs. At its most
basic, an NCA permits the restriction of competition against a
given business. By
statute, this restriction can encompass a specific geographic
area, a specific market area, and a specific amount of time.
However, a properly worded NCA may also prohibit the
disclosure of trade secrets or even information that doesn’t
quite qualify as a trade secret but that the business considers
valuable nonetheless. In
the long run, this oftentimes proves to be a much more important
feature. For
example, an NCA may prohibit the signatory from soliciting or
even disclosing the names of the business’s clients or from
employing the business’s employees for a given amount of time.
A
properly worded NCA can be crucial in safeguarding a
business’s trade secrets and business relationships.
Businesses should consider NCAs as part of each employment
contract and with each employee who comes into contact with
sensitive information or clients.
In
closing, let me relate a true story. A few years ago my firm
represented a start-up company that had first-mover status in
its market. When
the company’s principals came to see us, we initially inquired
about existing NCAs. They
had none. We
immediately drafted one for them and insisted that their key
employees sign them. The
company’s CIO refused. It
turns out he was already undertaking plans to circumvent the
company and set up shop on his own. Luckily for our client, we
were able to quickly control any damage. Though this problem can occur frequently in the freewheeling
new economy, it is easily remedied with a properly worded NCA.
